SCO v. IBM

Message ID: 118304 Posted By: boyle_m_owl Posted On: 2004-03-30 23:52:00 Subject: Incorrigible. Recs: 1 The article speaks for itself. http://tinyurl.com/22fyd Darl, it's official. You're a prick. On another note, I went live 24/7 on my machine at home with cable broadband. From plugging in the hardware to turning on the machine, the technician that watched said that it was easier than installing on a Windows box. I wouldn't know. I don't do Windows. -- BMO ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "boyle_m_owl" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 37663 Posted By: boyle_m_owl Posted On: 2003-09-04 19:17:00 Subject: Wonders... Recs: 14 As a long time user of Linux (since 1998...earlier if you count my first dabble with it in 1995) I've been a fan of this OS. (Previous OS history on my home machine: Dos/Win 3.1, OS/2 2.1 and Warp, Slackware Linux, DesqView X, Win95, Linux (Caldera 1.2, SuSE, Mandrake (for about a day, ugh) Suse 7.2) I'm waiting, hoping, praying, and I will hop and laugh with glee *when* this stock tanks and Darl & Co are arrested and jailed for fraud. SCO's lawsuit against IBM is without merit, else they could have had a restraining order against IBM distributing AIX by now. Where is it? It's nowhere. Where are the extortion ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H invoice letters? Nowhere. Where is SCO's proof? Nowhere. SCO was supposed to offer code examples LAST JUNE. It's now SEPTEMBER. Yo! Darl! Where's the friggin' code?! At this point, the only value...