SCO v. IBM

Message ID: 249198 Posted By: hamjudo2000 Posted On: 2005-03-23 17:28:00 Subject: Lawsuit costs for not filing 10* forms Recs: 0 Without the 10K and 10Q there is a whole class of litigants, err, I mean share holders, who are prevented from selling their shares on the open market. In the unlikely event of a share holder lawsuit, those folks will need a way to figure out how much they would have made, were they able to dump, err, I mean sell their holdings sooner. I can speculate on what would happen to the stock price if any of those large share holders were to dump their holdings, but I am clearly no expert in such things. But there is no need for speculation. The court can just look at the average price that BayStar is getting when it makes large sales. Unless there is something fraudulent going on, the price BayStar gets must represent the true value of the stock. After SCOXe crashes and burns, and the shareholder lawsuits start, large holders can compare wha...

Message ID: 199102 Posted By: hamjudo2000 Posted On: 2004-10-28 13:29:00 Subject: crabgrass fertilizer Recs: 1 Astroturfing doesn't seem to work here, so it looks like _they_ have switched to fertilizing the crabgrass. Recommendations are anonymous to people outside of Yahoo. This could be why limirics and grokwar posts are often highly recommended. Note, that I don't know who _they_ are. Are there other ways that _they_ fertilize? ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "hamjudo2000" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 152669 Posted By: hamjudo2000 Posted On: 2004-07-10 01:22:00 Subject: Re: Amazingly solid $5.00 Floor Recs: 3 > SCO's mangement is selling their options as stock, which they granted themselves, and at the same time buying that same stock with the stockholders money. > That's the only reason this pile of crap isn't below $5/share. SCO's management is pillaging the company. That's accurate, but incomplete. There are many actors in this play, only some of them are getting stock options. Darl is not cashing in stock options. However, he is getting a million a year to be the public face. If the stock price falls too far, too fast, it will be too hard to justify his salary. It's hazard pay, since he is most likely to go to jail if/when things fall apart. There are probably a few organizations that don't want to be in the public eye, but who do want to continue to get cash and/or FUD out of SCOX. How do they benefit by keep...